The paper presents systematic analysis of tracer study research method. The authors keep track of the progress of tracer monitoring from a tool for solution of local diagnostic problems to key element of comprehensive systems for production monitoring and management, integrated into the concept of digital field twins. The paper covers the main field applications of tracer technology, including evaluation of reservoir connectivity, optimization of waterflood systems, surveillance of enhanced oil recovery projects, and inflow profile monitoring. The relationship between reservoir facies heterogeneity and fluid (oil and water) flow pattern is examined in detail. Using the example of Bobrikovian formation of Sabanchinskoye field, confinement of formation damage zones to facies boundaries and spatial distribution of fracturing in terrigenous sediments are explained. It was proven that adequate description of reservoir fluid dynamics necessitates combination of lithological and facies models, rather than application of a lithological model alone. The conducted analysis provided the basis for the hypothesis describing fundamental principles for improvement of sweep and displacement efficiencies considering optimization of field development system, i.e. relative location of injection and production wells within each facies (geological body). The study also gives evidence of the processes of local fines migration and formation damage, which must be considered during field development. Tracer study became a critically important source of data for calibration of reservoir simulation models and support of real-time decision making within intelligent field concept. The research laid the foundations for application of facies-driven approach to interpretation of tracer data.
References
1. Tronov V.P., Fil′tratsionnyye protsessy i razrabotka neftyanykh mestorozhdeniy (Filtration processes and development of oil fields), Kazan: Fen Publ., 2004, 582 p.
2. Antonov G.P., Shalin P.A., Khisamov R.S., et al., Specification of geological structure of D1 formation at Abdrahmanovskaya area on the basis of indicative surveys results (In Russ.), Neftyanoye khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2002, No. 1, pp. 31-33.
3. Sokolovskiy E.V., Solov’ev G.B., Trenchikov Yu.I., Indikatornye metody izucheniya neftegazonosnykh plastov (Indicator methods for the study of oil and gas reservoirs), Moscow: Nedra Publ., 1986, 157 p.
4. Kuz′min YU.A., Khozyainov M.S., Study of the filtration characteristics of injected water in the Jurassic deposits of Siberia using a tritium indicator (In Russ.), Neftyanoye khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 1985, No. 6, pp. 36-40.
5. Muradyan A.V., Khozyainov M.S., Interpretation of indicator method data for assessing the filtration parameters of an oil reservoir (In Russ.), Geologiya nefti i gaza, 1987, No. 9, pp. 54-57.
6. Tronov V.P., Tronov A.V., Ochistka vod razlichnykh tipov dlya ispol’zovaniya v sisteme PPD (Purification of various types of water for use in the reservoir pressure maintenance system), Kazan: Fen Publ., 2001, 560 p.
7. Dekhtyarev V.A., On necessity of studying facies variability in mature oil fields (In Russ.), Neftyanaya provintsiya, 2025, No. 2, pp. 1–20,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25689/NP.2025.2.1-20
8. Abdulmazitov R.G., Sattarov R.Z., Latifullin F.M., Uchet izmeneniya kollektorskikh svoystv plasta pri dlitel′noy razrabotke neftyanogo ob′′yekta (Taking into account changes in reservoir properties during long-term development of an oil field), Collected papers “Aktual’nye problemy geologii i razrabotki neftyanykh mestorozhdeniy Tatarstana” (Actual problems of geology and development of Tatarstan oil fields), Moscow: Zakon i poryadok Publ., 2006, pp. 167–173.