The use of aphron-based fluids during drilling and killing well operation in low reservoir pressure conditions reduces the negative impact on reservoir porosity and permeability compared to standard process fluids. Temporary formation isolation in this case is achieved by microbubbles in the process fluid, which enter the pore space during repression operations and, by expanding, create a barrier that prevents subsequent penetration of bridging agents into the near-wellbore zone. A study on the influence of the concentration of the main components of aphron-based fluids biopolymer (xanthan gum) and surfactant on the physical properties of aphron-based systems is presented. Two series of experiments were conducted: one with an anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate) and one with a zwitterionic surfactant (cocamidopropyl betaine). Density, viscosity, shear pressure and dispersion were measured for each of the prepared compositions. The aging process of the aphron-containing compositions was also studied. The study results reflect the recommended biopolymer and surfactant concentrations for the preparation of process fluids for temporary formation isolation. The study revealed that the optimal xanthan gum concentration is 0,5 %. This polymer content ensures the stability of the aphron-based fluid for more than 24 hours. The threshold surfactant content at which the required process parameters of the aphron-based fluid are achieved is 0,025 %. A further increase in the concentration of surfactants leads to a significant decrease in density, an increase in foam multiplicity and an increase in the viscosity of the composition.
References
1. Yamov G.A., Ibragimova D.R., Milovanova V.V., Applicability of technology for killing gas and gas-condensate wells with foam compositions in Rosneft fields (In Russ.), Territorija NEFTEGAZ, 2021, No. 9, 10, pp. 58–66.
2. Patent no. 2330942 RF, Method of killing wells with abnormal low formation pressure, Inventors: Magadova L.A., Magadov R.S., Silin M.A., Gaevoy E.G., Efimov N.N., Nazyrov R.R., Larchenko Yu.A., Gur’yanov O.V.
3. Tikhomirov V.K., Peny. Teoriya i praktika ikh poluchenija i razrusheniya (Foams. Theory and practice of their production and destruction), Moscow: Khimiya Publ., 1983, 264 p.
4. Andaeva E.A., Sidorov L.S., Sidorov Ju.L., Jamen effect as a factor of wells productivity increase (In Russ.), Stroitel’stvo neftjanykh i gazovykh skvazhin na sushe i na more, 2013, no. 5, pp. 26–30.
5. Amiyan V.A. et al., Primenenie pennykh sistem v neftegazodobyche (Application of foam systems in oil and gas production), Moscow: Nedra Publ., 1987, 229 p.
6. Sebba F., Foams and biliquid foams. Aphrons, New York: Wiley, 1987, 236 p.
7. Brookey T., Micro-bubbles: New Aphron drill-in fluid technique reduces formation damage in horizontal wells, SPE-39589-MS, 1998,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/39589-MS
8. Perepelkin K.E., Matveev V.S., Gazovye emul’sii (Gas emulsions), Leningrad: Khimiya Publ., 1979, 200 .
9. Alizadeh A., Khamehchi E., Experimental investigation of the oil based Aphron drilling fluid for determining the most stable fluid formulation, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, V. 174, pp. 525–532, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.065
10. Bjorndalen N., Kuru E., Physico-chemical characterization of Aphron-based drilling fluids, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2008, V. 47, No. 1,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/2005-050
11. Growcock F., Enhanced wellbore stabilization and reservoir productivity with Aphron drilling fluid technology, Houston, Texas: MASI Technologies, 2005, 171 p.,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/896513
12. Mehrjoo H., Kazemzadeh Y., Ismail I. et al., A comprehensive review of colloidal gas Aphrons applications in the oil industry, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2025, No. 15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-025-01944-6
13. Arabloo M., Shahri M.P., Experimental studies on stability and viscoplastic modeling of colloidal gas aphron (CGA) based drilling fluids, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014, V. 113, pp. 8–22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.12.002
14. Pasdar M., Kazemzadeh E., Kamari E., Insight into selection of appropriate formulation for colloidal gas Aphron (CGA)-based drilling fluids, Petroleum Science, 2020, No. 17, pp. 759–767, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00435-z
15. Ramirez F., Greaves R., Montilva J., Experience using Microbubbles-Aphron drilling fluid in mature reservoirs of Lake Maracaibo, SPE-73710-MS, 2002,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/73710-MS
16. Rjazanov A.A., Sklyuev P.V., BabitskayaK.I., Bulgakov S.A., Application of viscoelastic systems in oil production intensification processes (In Russ.), Neftegazovoe delo, 2024, V. 22, No. 1, pp. 99–111, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2024-1-99-111
17. Babitskaya K.I., Konovalov V.V., Study on impact of the size of compound micelles comprised of anionic and nonionic surfactants on efficiency of residual oil displacement after flooding, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2016, V. 11, No. 16, pp. 9622–9626.
18. Nikitin V.I., Agrelkina M.M., Justification for the selection of a relative permeability model in the task of predicting drilling fluid filtrate invasion into the formation, International Journal of Engineering, 2025, No. 38(10), pp. 2312–2320, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.10a.08