This paper describes the approach for assessing the critical stress state and mechanical aperture of the fracture system in the near-wellbore zone, which takes into account the direction of the wellbore in relation to the revealed fracture system and the direction of the regional stress as well as the contribution of the wellbore pressure to the transition of a fracture to a critically stressed state with a subsequent increase in aperture.
Critically stressed state of a fracture was studied according to two criteria, such as dry friction criterion and Barton nonlinear shear strength criterion. The main differences between two criteria is about friction coefficient, in the case of dry friction criterion the more important are stresses (normal and shear) while in the case of the Barton nonlinear shear strength criterion shows that the importance is understanding of joint roughness coefficient, due to which the relationship between shear and normal stress becomes non-linear, also for different rocks strength will change, which approaches through such a parameter as the joint compressional strength (JCS).
The Barton-Bandis model was adopted as the fundamental model of fracture opening. This model allows the investigation of fracture aperture considering surface roughness and dilation due to shear displacement.
The simulation result is presented as a certain sinusoid (a fracture contour along the well surface, obtained from the results of the interpretation of the reservoir microscanner). The sinusoid has two attributes: fracture aperture in mm and critically stressed index. This allows us to explore how the critical stress state of a fracture in the near-wellbore zone changes when the pressure inside the well changes. This approach can be applied to select the optimal wellbore trajectory and reduce the risk of lost circulation in fractured reservoirs.
1. Zhigul’skiy S.V., Rotaru A.V., Lukin S.V. et al., Forecast of critical-stressed fractures on the basis of tectonophysics and geomechanical modeling on the example of the Riphean fractured carbonate reservoir in Eastern Siberia (In Russ.), Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 2017, no. 12, pp. 24-27, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2017-12-24-27
2. Zhigul’skiy S.V., Lukin S.V., Geomechanical and microseismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing in shale formation (In Russ.), Geofizika, 2018, no. 4, pp. 40-44.
3. Barton, C.A., Zoback, M.D., Moos D., Identification of hydraulically conductive fractures from the analysis of localized stress perturbations and thermals anomalies, Proceedings of Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering an Environmental Problems, 1994, pp. 945–952, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.208.1994_065
4. Bagrintseva K.I., Treshchinovatost’ osadochnykh porod (Fracturing of sedimentary rocks), Moscow: Nedra Publ., 1982.
5. Dubinya N.V., Rekonstruktsiya profiley gorizontal’nykh napryazheniy na osnovanii skvazhinnykh issledovaniy treshchinovatosti (Reconstruction of horizontal stress profiles based on borehole fracture studies): thesis of candidate of physical and mathematical science, Moscow, 2018.
6. Jaeger J.C., Cook N.G.W., Zimmerman R.W., Fundamentals of rock mechanics, London: Blackwell Publishing, 2007, 608 p.
7. Rebetskiy Yu.L., Sim L.A., Marinin A.V., Ot zerkal skol’zheniya k tektonicheskim napryazheniyam. Metody i algoritmy (From gliding plane to tectonic stresses. Methods and algorithms), Moscow: GEOS Publ., 2017, 234 p.
8. Barton N., Choubey V., The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1977, V. 10(1), pp. 1-54, DOI: https://10.1007/BF01261801
9. Barton N., Modelling rock joint behavior from in situ block tests: Implications for nuclear waste repository design: technical report, ONWI-308, prepared by Terra Tek, Inc. for Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, 1982, 118 p.
10. Zhigul’skiy S.V., Evaluation of conductive fracture aperture based on a detailed geomechanical model: Myth or reality in the context of complex fractured reservoir (In Russ.), SPE-196896-RU, 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/196896-MS
11. Barton N, Bandis S., Bakhtar K., Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints, IInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1985, V. 22, no. 3, pp. 121–140, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)93227-9
12. Bandis, S. Experimental studies of scale effects on shear strength, and deformation of rock joints: Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, Dept. of Earth Sciences, 1980.13.