Review of clustering and ranking methods for technological accessibility assessment of the Arctic seas as illustrated by the Barents Sea case study

UDK: 622.276.1/.4.04
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2017-7-64-67
Key words: Arctic, Barents Sea, technological accessibility, Fuzzy Logic, classification, clustering, ranking, multi-criterion approach
Authors: K.N. Pivovarov, A.B. Zolotukhin (Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), RF, Moscow)

Russian arctic shelves are highly prospective areas for oil and gas development. Commonly quoted technically recoverable hydrocarbon resources of the northern seas amount to 100 billion tons of oil equivalent (BTOE).

Development of the arctic seas oil and gas resources is only at its initial stage, and the proved system of planning is required to make the development process safe, reliable and rational.

One of the important tasks of forecasting activities on the Russian shelves is a technological accessibility assessment of the areas, perspective for oil and gas, and forecast of the sequence of the developing fields. Such an estimate accompanies environmental and industrial safety support on offshore production facilities, which is one of the most pressing challenges of the arctic resources development.

Analysis of climate and environmental conditions together with technical requirements is the first and absolute necessary stage of the classification method development. Formulation of the evaluation methodology is the second, equally important stage. It should include most important parameters and reflect the quality of the database. Understanding of the complexity of the development conditions and their correct «translation» to the math language enable to recognize technologically accessibility of the arctic shelves and to forecast their development correctly.

Description and analysis of several available classification methods is given in the article together with our own classification concept, namely, clustering and ranking based on Fuzzy Logic principles. It is shown that the approach introduced by authors has few advantages, enabling execution of the technological accessibility assessment with better quality. Another advantage is that this approach allows to model scenario of regional development, based on sequential putting on production fields depending on complexity of their development.

References

1. Bogoyavlenskiy V.I., Prospects and problems of the Arctic shelf oil and gas fields development (In Russ.), Burenie i neft', 2012, no. 11, pp. 4–10.

 2. Orlov A.I., On the development of mathematical methods in the theory of classification (review) (In Russ.), Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov = Industrial Laboratory, 2009, V. 75, no. 7, pp. 51–63.

3. Korotkov E.M., Issledovanie sistem upravleniya (Research of management systems), Moscow: DeKA Publ., 2000, 118 p.

4. Podinovskiy V.V., Vvedenie v teoriyu vazhnosti kriteriev v mnogokriterial'nykh zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy (Introduction to the theory of the importance of criteria in multi-criteria decision-making problems), Moscow: Fizmatlit Publ, 2007, 67 p.

5. Prudent development: Realizing the potential of North America’s abundant natural gas and oil resources, Arctic National petroleum council of USA, 2011, URL: www.npc.org

6. Sochnev O.Ya., Zhukovskaya E.A., Technical availability of the Russian shelf for development in modern conditions (In Russ.), Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2013, no. 2 (10), pp. 48–61.

7. GEBCO layer for ArcGIS map / ArcGIS, URL: http://www.arcgis.com/

8. Sochneva I.O., Sovremennye tekhnologii osvoeniya morskikh neftegazovykh mestorozhdeniy (Modern technologies of development of offshore oil and gas fields), Moscow: Gazoil press Publ., 2016, 384 p.

9. Russian-Norwegian oil and gas industry cooperation in the High North, URL: http://www.intsok.com/Market-info/Markets/Russia/RU-NO-Project

10. Arctic – the next risk frontier, URL: https://www.dnvgl.com/technology-innovation/broader-view/arctic/the-arctic-risk-picture.html

11. Leonenkov A.V., Nechetkoe modelirovanie v srede MATLAB i fuzzyTECH (Fuzzy modeling in the MATLAB and FuzzyTECH), St. Petersburg: BKhV Peterburr Publ., 2005, 736 p.

12. Kruglov V.V., Nechetkaya logika i iskusstvennye neyronnye seti (Fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks), Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Fiziko-matematicheskoy literatury Publ., 2001, 224 p.

13. Zolotukhin A.B., Engineering methods in petroleum sciences, Course of lectures, preprint of University of Stavanger, 2007, 207 p.

14. Zade L.A., Fuzzy sets, Infrom. and Control, 1965, V. 8(3), pp. 338–353.

15. Khurgin Ya.I., Nechetkie metody v neftegazovoy promyshlennosti (Fuzzy methods in the oil and gas industry), Moscow: Publ. of Gubkin State University of Oil and Gas, 1995, 131 p.


Attention!
To buy the complete text of article (Russian version a format - PDF) or to read the material which is in open access only the authorized visitors of the website can. .